By John Gruber
WorkOS: Let agents use your tools without giving them free rein.
Drake Bennett and Ian King, reporting for Bloomberg (gift link):
At the end, Jensen Huang looked broken and shattered, his legendary energy depleted. After weeks spent denying the allegations of infidelity and fighting to remain in his job as Nvidia Corp.’s chief executive officer, his surrender late Wednesday night was unconditional. Huang’s usual take-charge demeanor had evaporated, according to a person familiar with the situation, and he’d started using phrases like “whatever” and “I don’t care.”
For the decades he spent building Nvidia into a multitrillion-dollar AI chip behemoth, Huang was famous for his attention to the tiniest of details, from chip architecture to the compensation packages of even the most junior employees at the company. Now, in the eyes of the people in the room, he had given up.
According to people who’ve spoken with him in recent days, Huang has already taken a penitent turn, castigating himself as a “piece of shit.”
It really is sad. No joke here. It’s sad.
Ashley Belanger, Ars Technica:
A global outage taking down a wide range of Microsoft 365 services remains ongoing Friday morning.
The outage started midday Thursday, impacting users of Microsoft email, cloud, and AI services. Microsoft has documented the full list of services impacted by the error, while moving early Friday morning to protect customers around the world from losing emails during the extended disruptions.
“Recovery actions are ongoing,” the Microsoft 365 Status account confirmed on X. “To help preserve delayed mail during this event, we’ve extended email timeout to 48 hours.”
So it’s more like Microsoft 363 at this point.
David Sacks, on X:
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already.
Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy?
- AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”).
- CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”).
- DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”).
- Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed.
Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.”
First, as for “who argues otherwise?”, the U.S. State Department is who. But more importantly, the degree to which Alice Huang worked for or with China’s MSS is almost a footnote on this scandal. It’s not central to the story at all.
It’s bad enough that Jensen Huang was having a yearslong affair with an executive from any Nvidia client. But Megaspeed was apparently a shell company dedicated to circumventing U.S. export controls for AI hardware to China. Alice Huang is, apparently, a criminal smuggler working to circumvent U.S. national security policy. If she was also cooperating with or taking direction from MSS that’s just icing on the cake.
I wrote in a post earlier today that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is being teed up to be scapegoated — deservedly — for the ails of the Republican Party and Trump administration. Sacks, I think, is going to be right there with him — also deservedly. This whole “Maybe she’s not a spy so the whole story is a scam” argument is drenched with flop sweat.
Sacks originally joined Team Trump 2.0 as “AI czar”. In that capacity he was the leading proponent in the Trump administration for a hands-off approach to AI regulation generally, and specifically a look-the-other-way policy regarding Nvidia’s 20-percent-of-revenue side hustle selling banned-for-sale-to-China hardware to smugglers.
Sacks might not just get sacked. If this goes south and people wind up being convicted of crimes, Sacks will be at the front of that line too. The pardon from Trump will cost Sacks real money.
Paresh Dave and Zoë Schiffer, reporting for Wired:
Some Nvidia employees are calling for Jensen Huang’s return even after his multiple reported extramarital affairs and abrupt resignation, according to internal correspondence reviewed by Wired.
An internal “suggestion box” post submitted before Huang’s resignation by a longtime engineer at Nvidia urged the company’s board to take employee sentiment into consideration prior to taking any action. The submission has attracted more than 1,600 comments since then, with several asking board members to find a way to bring back Huang.
“If you believe in the mission, bring back THE boss,” wrote one anonymous commenter.
Nvidia has over 42,000 employees (for now). The 1,600 who commented on this petition might just be the ones Huang was shtupping.
Ana Swanson, Tripp Mickle, Maggie Haberman, and Jonathan Swan, in a long deeply-sourced profile of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (gift link):
There is broad agreement among most senior Trump administration officials that the United States should more aggressively tighten controls on Nvidia’s advanced chips to keep China from using them to catch up in the race to dominate artificial intelligence.
Then there is Howard Lutnick, who runs the Commerce Department. [...]
Within the Commerce Department, Nvidia is treated differently than other firms, current and former officials say, with its issues given high priority and sent through specific channels.
Mr. Lutnick frequently calls and messages with Mr. Huang, and the department prepares carefully for their private meetings together in Mr. Lutnick’s fifth floor office. All Nvidia matters are routed through Jeff Kessler, a top deputy to Mr. Lutnick, who is said to rarely take any significant action without the commerce secretary’s approval.
Nvidia’s general counsel has also been given direct access to shape new rules, including leaving comments in draft regulations affecting the company.
Here’s a photo from the Times story, taken this July in the Washington D.C. Cheesecake Factory, with Lutnick telling Jensen Huang, “Dude, seriously, smell my finger...”

Republicans as a party, and the Trump administration in particular, need scapegoats for the historical disaster of their election losses last week. Huang and Nvidia are going to be one of them. Lutnick is another. He’s cooked.
Aisha Malik, TechCrunch:
Ex-Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has agreed to testify before Congress, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast said on Thursday, according to reports from Bloomberg and NBC News. Huang, who stepped down as CEO following reports of an alleged affair with a woman suspected of spying for China, agreed to testify Wednesday after several senior lawmakers threatened to subpoena him.
Huang has agreed to testify before Congress by Thanksgiving, which falls later this month. [...]
The testimony will take place behind closed doors, though Mast said he expects the briefing to be recorded on video and transcribed.
Closed-door is pantomime. Public reckonings will come next year. This whole thing could crater Nvidia’s stock price, sinking the market, and it’s Nvidia’s investments that are propping up the entire AI industry. So if the whole economy takes a severe beating in the coming months, imagine just how much more contentious Congressional inquiries under Democratic control could be.
I’m of the belief that the whole AI boom is ultimately a complex Ponzi scheme, and Ponzi schemes, by their nature, eventually crash out. But now Huang has set himself up as the villain. If I’m right and there’s an inevitable crash, it’s probably coming soon, and those who are left holding the bag aren’t going to come to their senses, realize it was an unsustainable circular financing scam all along, and blame themselves for falling for it. They’re going to blame Jensen Huang for not keeping his dick in his pants.
Emine Yücel, reporting for TPM:
Mississippi prosecutor Scott Colom officially defeated incumbent Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) Wednesday night. Colom will be the first Democrat to represent Mississippi in the Senate since 1982 and he will also become the state’s first Black senator in nearly 150 years.
150 years is, needless to say, a long time. The crazy part about that is that Mississippi has the highest proportion of black citizens in the entire country (38 percent).
Colom, by all accounts, ran a fantastic campaign, with little to no support from the national Democratic Party because almost no one imagined Mississippi — the deepest of the deep South — might turn blue. This commercial Colom ran is one of the best I’ve ever seen. Not just best political commercials. I mean it’s one of the best 30-second spots ever made. It’s perfect. I just keep watching it over and over.
Update: I stand corrected on the national support. The WSJ ran a story back in September — six weeks before the election — on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer raising funds for Colom amongst big Democratic donors. Schumer smelled a winner.
Actual headline from an actual press release: “Peacock Extends Its Vertical Video Leadership With a Reimagined Mobile Experience”. Please tell me that someone printed up some t-shirts and hats with “Vertical Video Leadership” on them.
Lingling Wei, reporting for The Wall Street Journal:
Before the affair that threatened his job as Nvidia’s chief executive, Jensen Huang was introduced to his future romantic interest, Alice Huang, by a Chinese businessman he’d known for a decade, Kang Wei.
Kang also happened to be Alice Huang’s husband, said people who know the couple.
For two years, Kang appeared to accept his wife’s romantic relationship with the Nvidia CEO and spoke openly of their closeness, these people said. Sometimes, Kang told associates, half-jokingly, that she was a personal assistant to Jensen Huang, they said.
The Cars’ “My Best Friend’s Girl” is not a bad song to have stuck in your head. Not a bad song at all.
Over the past decade, Kang and Alice Huang hopscotched from one lucrative opportunity to the next — videogame companies, pharmaceutical takeovers and cloud computing — each time weaving a web of related entities, transferring stakes among themselves and capitalizing on whatever connections were at hand, said people familiar with the couple’s business dealings. Nvidia’s AI chips were the latest play for a couple with a track record of riding hot trades and, on occasion, running afoul of regulators.
Now the couple are the subject of a raft of investigations, and the blast radius of their relations with Jensen Huang is expanding.
U.S. officials believe that China’s intelligence services recruited Alice Huang as an asset because of her access to the chip-designer chief.
That sentence at the end clarifies what I think is, at the moment, a widely held misconception. The allegation that Alice Huang was a “spy” for Chinese intelligence isn’t that she was a trained secret agent whose mission was to seduce Jensen Huang and infiltrate Nvidia. It’s that once the Chinese spooks learned of the affair — which, in hindsight, wasn’t well hidden — they gave Alice Huang an offer she couldn’t refuse. To do what, we don’t know, but it sure sounds like a part of it was to procure and smuggle Nvidia hardware in contravention of U.S. national security regulations.
Reuters:
Ousted Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had an intimate relationship with a second employee, according to two people familiar with the matter, Reuters has learned.
The revelation follows two other extramarital affairs that led to his resignation Thursday. The two women are Alice Huang, who US intelligence suspects of being a Chinese spy, and Kimberly Powell, Nvidia’s vice president of health care.
Reuters is not naming the second employee. Attempts to reach the woman were not successful.
What’s the over-under at? If it’s 4.5, I’ll take the over.
The president of the United States, on his blog:
NOW THAT Nvidia CEO JENSEN HUANG, who has done a fantastic job, has resigned, there is only one man to take his place — TIM COOK of Apple. A Legend replaces a Legend! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Nope.
Jenson Huang, in an on-stage interview with Garry Tan at Y Combinator’s “Startup School”, three months ago, on how Nvidia is organized (starting at 17m:00s):
Huang: You’re going to build an F1 racer, but you’re going to build it in a way that you can drive. You should adapt the car to you. Somebody asked me, Jensen, if you don’t use conventional management techniques and organizational techniques, what’s going to happen when you leave the company?
Well, when I die on the job — someday — I told them they’ll just have to reshape the company for the next CEO. And the reason that’s wisdom is because we’re the F1 drivers. We’re the racers. And the world is really competitive, and we’ve got to win. We’ve got to achieve our mission. And so whatever it takes to fit the car to you, whatever it takes to fit the organization to you, that’s what you got to do. And the next CEO, whatever their personality is, they can figure it out.
Tan: Amazing.
It now seems like there are better words than “amazing” to describe this structure and strategy, for what was — at the time of the interview — the biggest company by market cap in the world. As of this morning, they’ve dropped to #2, and I think they’re going to drop to #3 or #4 soon.
By Huang’s own description, Nvidia needs to completely rebuild the car for his successor. And Huang left at least two huge turds in the cockpit of the existing car. (My money says there are more turds yet to be revealed.)
Nvidia Newsroom:
Nvidia Board of Directors announced today that Jensen Huang has resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the Board, effective immediately.
Colette Kress, current Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NVIDIA, has agreed to serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer. Kress will continue to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer while serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer until a permanent successor has been named. The Board is initiating a search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer and will consider internal and external candidates. [...]
“Colette has helped lead NVIDIA through a period of extraordinary growth and has a deep understanding of our business, customers, operations and financial position,” said Harvey Jones, Chair of the NVIDIA Board of Directors. “She is supported by an experienced leadership team that has been instrumental in executing NVIDIA’s strategy and advancing its technology roadmap. The Board has full confidence in Colette and the leadership team, and we expect the company’s operations, customer commitments and product roadmap to continue without interruption.”
This might be wishful thinking. Remember all the predictions that Apple would implode without Steve Jobs? That he was the company? I argued, on the day of his resignation, that Apple was likely to continue to thrive post-Jobs, writing, “Jobs’s greatest creation isn’t any Apple product. It is Apple itself.” He built a great company with a deep bench and a highly distinctive, incredibly strong culture.
I’m not seeing anyone say those things about Nvidia. In fact I’ve only seen the opposite — that Nvidia has a weak board and an executive structure with Huang at the top and 60 direct reports under him. Nvidia sounds like it is the fantasy version of Apple that people imagined when Jobs’s health finally failed.
The press release contains no quote from Huang, and his X account is silent.
Nvidia will report its third-quarter fiscal 2027 financial results on Tuesday, November 17, at approximately 1:20 p.m. PT, as previously scheduled, followed by its earnings call at 2 p.m. PT.
They should sell tickets to this one.
Rohan Goswami, Reed Albergotti, and Ashley Gold, reporting for Semafor at 10:27pm ET:
Some members of Nvidia’s board favor appointing Chief Financial Officer Colette Kress as interim CEO at the beleaguered chipmaker if CEO and founder Jensen Huang is ousted, according to people familiar with the matter.
Here’s Kress’s LinkedIn profile.
Semafor earlier confirmed that Nvidia’s board is preparing to oust Huang as soon as Wednesday, after media reports detailed that he had a second extramarital affair. The Nvidia board briefed the White House on its planned meeting, according to a senior administration official.
Nvidia has tapped an outside search firm to find the company’s next CEO, Bloomberg reported. One person being considered for the top job is Apple hardware chief Johny Srouji, who was among the executives considered for Intel CEO in 2019, according to another person familiar with the matter.
Kara Swisher spitballed Tim Cook as an idea, but that’s nonsense. If Cook wanted to be the CEO of a Fortune 2 company, he’d still be CEO at Apple. Apple despises Nvidia and Nvidia despises Apple. Cook may well be enjoying this fiasco, but only as entertainment drizzled with fresh farm-to-table schadenfreude — not as a personal opportunity.
Srouji, though, is an interesting name. Semafor doesn’t say whether this is just wishful thinking on the part of Nvidia’s board or if Srouji has indicated receptiveness. Srouji has been at Apple since 2008 but he’s a bit of a cipher. My spidey-sense can’t tell if he bleeds six colors or not.
Mark Gurman — and no one else — claimed last year that Srouji went to Tim Cook and threatened to leave for another company. Srouji called bullshit on this with a memo that stated flatly, “I love my job at Apple, and I don’t plan on leaving anytime soon.” Then, in April, when John Ternus was named Cook’s successor, Srouji was simultaneously promoted to the new position of Chief Hardware Officer.
So one scenario is that Srouji feels no allegiance to Apple, and Tim Cook and John Ternus are the sort of leaders who, when faced with a threat from a subordinate, give in because they’re cowards, and give a big promotion to someone who might leave Apple for a rival just weeks after Apple’s CEO transition.
Another scenario is that Srouji meant what he said, loves his job at Apple, and truly is John Ternus’s trusted and trustworthy hardware lieutenant. In this case, Nvidia’s board leaking that they’re considering Srouji to replace Huang is like someone in hell saying they’re considering ordering some ice water. My money is on this scenario.
Nina Trentmann and Ian King, reporting tonight for Bloomberg:
Nvidia Corp.’s board has been working with an outside firm to identify potential replacements for Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang following reports of multiple extramarital affairs, including one with a woman who is reportedly suspected of spying for China, a person familiar with the situation said.
The board is weighing the idea of naming a temporary chief while searching for a permanent one, the person said, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public. Directors were meeting on Wednesday to discuss Huang’s fate, according to people familiar with the situation. The Wall Street Journal said earlier that the board was preparing to oust Huang, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. Nvidia didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
There’s no obvious internal candidate because Huang rejected any sort of succession planning within the company’s ranks. I don’t know who they could hire from outside with gravitas, expertise, and integrity who would want the job. It looks more and more like 20 percent of their sales have been illegally smuggled into China and Nvidia covered it up. There’s more to clean up here than marital infidelities.
If the board goes ahead and sacks Huang, I think they should find the best internal candidate and promote them. At least as the temporary CEO. Then conduct a measured search for a replacement. Panicking would only make this worse — but Nvidia’s board is a bunch of no-names who might be shitting their pants at the moment.
Robbie Whelan, Josh Dawsey, Amrith Ramkumar, reporting for The Wall Street Journal in the aftermath of the NYT’s scoop that Huang was having an affair with an Nvidia vice president too:
Nvidia’s board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang after he had two extramarital affairs, including one with a suspected Chinese spy and another with an employee.
The board is planning to meet as soon as Wednesday to determine his future, people familiar with the matter said. His departure would bring down the curtain on an era during which he stoked the global artificial-intelligence boom and became a geopolitical star. It would leave one of the world’s most valuable companies in need of a new leader.
The WSJ report was filed at 7p ET Wednesday, so presumably “as soon as Wednesday” means tonight. I give it better than even odds that we wake up tomorrow and Huang is out.
Ryan Mac, Tripp Mickle, and Georgia Gee, reporting for The New York Times:
Jensen Huang, the leader of Nvidia who is under investigation for an affair with a woman who U.S. intelligence determined is a Chinese spy, also had an extramarital relationship with an executive who reports to him, according to five people who worked at the company.
The relationship, which has not been previously reported, was with Kimberly Powell, Nvidia’s vice president of health care, said the people, who spoke under the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive information. Under Nvidia’s code of conduct, employees are told to “avoid situations where our actions create conflict” including “personal relationships,” and the company states that it “promptly investigates reports of misconduct.” Many corporations have policies against managers having relationships with subordinates.
Mr. Huang, 63, and Ms. Powell, 48, were captured on video being affectionate at a San Jose, Calif., hotel during a Nvidia conference in March, according to two of the people who worked at the company. The New York Times has not seen the video.
Both Mr. Huang and Ms. Powell are married to other people.
If there are other affairs, it seems pretty likely that intelligence agencies know about those too. He wasn’t very secretive about either of the affairs that have come out so far. If there are more, those who know about them in the China-hawk U.S. national security community are going to keep leaking new ones every few days until Huang resigns or the Nvidia board fires him. And at this point I would bet there are more affairs.
When reached by phone Wednesday and asked about his relationship with Ms. Powell, Mr. Huang said, “I don’t think you should be talking to me directly.” He then hung up. [...]
In March, Ms. Powell appeared at GTC, Nvidia’s annual developer conference in San Jose, where she spoke about using A.I. to aid in breakthroughs in health care and biology. Her presentation used cartoon depictions of Mr. Huang.
During the conference, Nvidia executives were at a nearby hotel for meetings. Mr. Huang and Ms. Powell were seen being affectionate at the hotel. One bystander captured the interaction on their phone, three people briefed on the incident said. Mr. Huang’s security workers witnessed the bystander with the phone and sequestered the person, the people said. The workers then asked the person to sign a nondisclosure agreement.
The Times doesn’t say whether the “bystander” signed the agreement, whether they were offered anything in exchange for signing it, or whether they were an Nvidia employee (in which case the offer could have been that they get to keep their job in exchange for signing it). The Times also doesn’t say whether Huang’s security team carries a pad of NDAs with them, like meter maids do with parking tickets.
Jason Snell:
These message boards were an embarrassment for Apple. Not only were they very much out of step with what the web has come to be over the last couple of decades, but their presence under an apple.com domain meant that they ranked highly in search and were perceived by the general public as being official in some way.
I’m with Snell. Good riddance.
Austin Mann:
Honestly, the idea of a folding iPhone didn’t immediately appeal to me. I usually like smaller devices, but when I first started playing with the Duo in September, I realized it’s really something special and I couldn’t wait to get my hands on a review unit from Apple. The iPhone 18 Pro remains the most powerful camera in the lineup, and though the Duo also has an excellent camera, where it really shines is everything around the photograph: planning, editing and sharing.
There are many reasons to prefer any of the regular (“uno”) iPhones to the Duo, but for almost everyone, the camera is not one of them. The iPhone Duo’s ultrawide 0.5× lens is either identical or nearly identical to the iPhone 18 Pro’s. It’s nice to have the Pro’s 4×/8× telephoto third lens when you really need it. And, yes, the Pro’s 1×/2× main camera is definitely the best one that Apple makes.
But just like with the iPhone Air — whose one-lens camera I love — the Duo’s 1×/2× main camera is really good. Just look at the photos Mann captured with it. Gorgeous. The camera system is not a reason not to buy a Duo.
(That said, when Mann captured this stylish photo of me at Apple’s “Pro and Tell” event in Los Angeles last month, he was carrying his iPhone 18 Pro.)
This is a really good and fair Duo review.
Mike McIntire and Eli Murray, reporting for The New York Times (gift link)
For nearly two decades, judges across the country have invoked this language to strike down gun-control laws. It is a pivotal legal test.
It is also based on a misquote.
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the 2008 case, District of Columbia v. Heller, attributed the “dangerous and unusual” language to Sir William Blackstone, an 18th-century English jurist whose writings became the basis for much of American law.
But in his seminal 1769 treatise, “Commentaries on the Laws of England,” Blackstone referred to weapons that were “dangerous or unusual,” suggesting that a gun did not need to be both in order to be restricted.
I’ve written before that Heller overturned two centuries of Supreme Court interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. The current interpretation — literally the NRA’s interpretation — was characterized by former Chief Justice Warren Burger as “one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”
So it’s not like anything needs to rest on this and-vs.-or misquoting of something William Blackstone wrote before the United States was even founded. But, still, it’s interesting nonetheless how often the gun-fetish jurists like to cite the misquoting. The government should, and can, regulate dangerous weapons.
Gary Marcus:
When a business needs exponentially increasing amounts of capital to make modest increases in quality in an intensely competitive market and still owes far more money than it has ever made, there is a serious problem.
I continue to believe that there is no moat in AI models. None. But the entire premise of Anthropic’s IPO is that they have an enormous gulf of a moat.
I would not be shocked to see Anthropic go out of business. Nor would I be shocked if the IPO fails. WeWork tried to IPO, 3 times, and didn’t make it.
I would be surprised if Anthropic does not go out of business. Most cults implode, and Anthropic doesn’t even hide that they’re a cult. And I just don’t see how the math works. Scientology is a long-running cult, but Scientology hasn’t committed $900 billion in spending over the next few years.
(Marcus’s post is on his Substack blog, which, annoyingly, requires you to be logged into a Substack account and to “subscribe”, even though it’s ostensibly a free post. What a rotten oppressive turd of a blogging platform Substack is. Just in case your Substack account isn’t working, here’s a PDF archive.)
Electronic Materials Office is the brainchild of Andrew Emerson. Back in 2023 he launched the Altar I, a rather distinctive mechanical keyboard. Much thinner than most, very opinionated in its industrial design and keycap typography. I got one and I don’t regret it, but there was too much I didn’t like about it, so it’s mostly sat in a drawer.
Today on Kickstarter Emerson/EMO has launched a campaign for the Altar II. Same cool aesthetic, but with improvements that address everything I didn’t like about the Altar I. The Altar II has all new switches. It’s so thin it resembles the profile of Apple’s Magic Keyboard from the side. The dial — now called the M-Dial — now attaches magnetically, which means it’s easy to detach for putting the keyboard into a bag. And it has new features that never even occurred to me, like NiteLite — backlighting from “a long-wavelength amber-red light that won’t affect your body’s circadian rhythm, meaning you can sleep better at night.” The sleep benefits might be voodoo but red lights are undeniably easier on your eyes at night, and it looks cool as shit. (My favorite feature of Apple Watch Ultra is “Night Mode” — a handful of watch faces that switch to all-red in the dark.)
I love that mechanical keyboards have come back into vogue, and that the market for them is thriving. But most of them annoy me. Often because they aren’t really keyboards — they’re design-your-own-keyboard kits. Kits are fun, but I want someone else to do the hard work of making all the design decisions. Don’t make me choose between half a dozen (or more!) types of switches. You’re the goddamn keyboard designer, you pick the switches. That’s my thinking. Altar II is that type of keyboard — one that has been properly and thoroughly designed for you. You just choose the key layout — US or UK. That’s it.
Another thing I don’t like about most mechanical keyboards — that also makes them feel like a hobby, not a finished product — is that they’re designed for cross-platform use. If they’re customizable via software, the software tends to be confusing and poorly made. Altar II is designed for the Mac and is going to come with a native Mac app for configuration. Fuckin’-A right.
I haven’t tried the Altar II yet because it’s only at the preproduction stage. That’s why it’s on Kickstarter. You can wait and see what I think of it next year. But if you jump on the Kickstarter now, there’s a first-48-hours early bird price that will save you $70. Retail price is going to be $350; for the remaining 40 hours or so, you can book one for just $280. After tomorrow, Kickstarter pricing goes up to $300.
Mackenzie Hawkins, reporting yesterday for Bloomberg:
Despite that stance, in the months after Teter’s initial call with Kessler, Nvidia gave BIS an incomplete account of its business with Megaspeed. After several visits to Megaspeed’s data centers — 12 facilities owned by eight companies across three countries in Southeast Asia — Nvidia had sent inventory checks to the agency and declared to Bloomberg News in mid-November 2025 that everything was where it should be.
The company also said at the time that it had asked the US government whether it needed to cut off business with Megaspeed, and was told no.
But Nvidia’s tabulations, as relayed to the US government, undercounted the number of chips it had sold to Megaspeed via hardware partners by 50,000 units, according to trade records analyzed by Bloomberg. That’s worth billions of dollars. After being pressed about the gap, Nvidia told Bloomberg in December 2025 that it had checked additional Megaspeed warehouses that contained the missing hardware, while declining to state exactly how many chips it found in those facilities or provide any further details.
Steve Jobs to 60 Minutes in 2003: “Great things in business are never done by one person. They’re done by a team of people.”
(I linked to this just a few months ago, but thought it worth a re-link today.)
Steven Levy at Wired, in a terrific post-event follow-up to his exclusive early look at the new MacBook Pros (News+ link):
I first met Ternus in 2015, when I spent a day with him at Apple’s Input Design Lab, a testing facility in Cupertino. He’d risen to VP for Mac, iPad, Ecosystem, and Audio Engineering, and he struck me as affable and knowledgeable. (He spent four years right out of college at a virtual reality company, but he’s been at Apple ever since.) The peg to my story at the time was how this unknown manager conducted a Javert-like investigation to fix the weird sound a redesigned mouse made when sliding on a table.
That attention to detail was a legacy of Jobs’ perfectionism, which Tim Cook sustained as the next CEO. In the decade when Ternus overlapped with Jobs, he says he had only “a handful of interactions” with the founder. “But I’ve always felt like sort of a student of Steve’s teachings,” Ternus said. “And then being able to work very closely with Tim, I’ve been very lucky.” [...]
The extent to which Ternus is a deep Apple insider became clear when I probed him on his views on being a corporate leader. I asked him which non-Apple CEOs he admires, and he was stumped. “I haven’t really thought about that,” he said. I asked whether any business books had an impact on him. “Not really,” he said. “Of course I’ve read books, but there’s so much to be learned from the people I get to work with.” Indeed, every time I tried to pin down Ternus on what mark he wants to make at Apple, he deflected the question and told me how he will continue Apple’s commitment to internal collaboration.
My thanks to OurCal for sponsoring last week at DF. You ever have a discussion that starts with “I didn’t see you put that on the calendar”? Could be with your colleagues, could be with your family. But the problem is familiar: Shared calendars solved scheduling, not communication.
OurCal connects any calendar, new or existing, to a group chat. Changes post there automatically, so nobody misses them. Because it’s a messenger, they made everything end-to-end encrypted, certified by France’s cybersecurity agency.
OurCal is native SwiftUI across Apple’s platforms, and the App Store just featured it in “Great apps on iPhone Duo”. They’ve got an Android app too, but they’re an Apple-first company. It’s really well done. Even the app icon is chef’s kiss.
OurCal is free to try, then a low monthly group subscription. No ads, no tracking.
Nick Heer, Pixel Envy:
There are a whole bunch of features and fixes coming to Safari with Apple’s OS 27.3 update. One that is not in the beta release notes but appears nevertheless is support for Global Privacy Control. This new standard is effectively a replacement for Do Not Track with legal muscle that should permit you to indicate your tracking preference one time and then, theoretically, never again see a cookie consent banner.
Charlie Warzel, writing for The Atlantic (gift link):
It is curious, then, that, as news came out that the Nvidia CEO, Jensen Huang, had had a romantic relationship with a Chinese businesswoman who was also an asset of Beijing’s Ministry of State Security, notable factions of Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C., seemed nonplussed. “Even incredible humans make mistakes,” Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge-fund manager, posted on X yesterday. “We should all support him and his family. Onward.” The venture capitalist Shaun Maguire offered a five-point analysis of Huang’s situation, noting that the CEO did something “incredibly dumb” and “bad for America,” but that “my guess is there was no bad intention.” He then argued, “I believe Jensen is irreplaceable for America’s AI leadership.” Elon Musk agreed. From there, the posts, written before we know all the facts of the scandal, got only more absurd, including defending Huang’s affair on the grounds that his kids are adults now. [...]
Huang’s thinking on issues such as AI doomerism (he’s anti-doom) and chip allocation in China (he’s for it — a position that warrants examining, given this weekend’s revelations) influences U.S. policy. This centrality is why one tech analyst on CNBC this morning implied that replacing Huang was a comical suggestion. Huang is a singular figure: the linchpin of the company that is arguably the linchpin of the American economy. Framed another way, Nvidia has much of the financial system in a hostage situation. Huang is too big to fail. Which may be why so many people seem motivated to downplay or protect him right now.
Elbert Hubbard: “The graveyards are full of people the world could not do without.”
Ana Swanson and Devlin Barrett, reporting yesterday for The New York Times (gift link):
Investigators at the Commerce Department were deep into a monthslong investigation of a Singaporean company that they suspected of smuggling Nvidia’s artificial intelligence chips into China when their work came to a sudden halt late last year. The investigation centered on Megaspeed, a data center company led by an executive who U.S. officials now believe to be a Chinese spy who had a relationship with Nvidia’s chief executive, Jensen Huang.
But the case was abruptly transferred to the Justice Department last year. The shift came after Commerce Department investigators working on the case received an email from Nvidia’s general counsel seeking information about the inquiry into Megaspeed.
It is not necessarily unusual for Commerce Department agents working on a case to speak with a company’s representatives about issues involving their firm. But what was unusual was the content of the message. Tim Teter, Nvidia’s general counsel, said that Jeff Kessler, a top official at the department, had given Nvidia permission to reach out about the case.
The agents were alarmed that Nvidia had invoked the name of Mr. Kessler, their superior, who was nominated to his role by President Trump. Some viewed Mr. Kessler’s interaction with Nvidia as violating government procedure and potentially tainting the case, according to current and former government officials and others familiar with the incident.
“Nice job you have there. Be a shame if something happened to it.”
If this is as abjectly corrupt as it sounds, it seems indefensible — and Congressional oversight investigations are now inevitable with both the House and Senate in Democratic hands. This isn’t just pocket-stuffing corruption — it’s a national security issue.
Mackenzie Hawkins, Andy Lin, and Kari Soo Lindberg, reporting for Bloomberg last year on December 22 (Archive.today link):
In an industry run by titans, a Singapore AI firm called Megaspeed International Pte. is drawing an unusual amount of attention. In less than three years, the once-obscure spinoff of a Chinese gaming enterprise has evolved into the single largest Southeast Asian buyer of Nvidia Corp. chips — a rapid ascent that’s lifted hopes for a regional champion in the lucrative business of AI cloud computing.
Now Megaspeed finds itself a focal point of Washington’s long-held fears about semiconductor smuggling into China, an issue of escalating concern among national security hawks despite Nvidia’s repeated assurances that chip diversion doesn’t exist. [...]
Nvidia, which conducts regular spot-checks of data centers around the world, told Bloomberg that it went to Megaspeed’s facilities multiple times to verify that there’s nothing untoward. “Our visits confirmed that the GPUs shipped to Megaspeed by our partners are where they are supposed to be,” an Nvidia spokesperson said in mid-November.
It turns out these inspections were rather intimately thorough, conducted firsthand by Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang. Nothing untoward indeed.
One of several questions I have: When did Jensen Huang break off the relationship with Alice Huang? I get the impression that the affair was still ongoing at least as recently as May, when the whole weird thing happened with Huang being invited to join Trump’s envoy to Beijing mid-flight. It’s possible the affair was still ongoing until this weekend.
But how can Jensen Huang defend continuing the affair even after Bloomberg was reporting the above last December?
Culper Research is a short-seller that published a report (PDF and in a thread on X) in May alleging that Nvidia “had a China problem”. From the start of its report:
Nvidia claims that its business in China went to “zero” after April 2025 U.S. trade restrictions. We believe that in reality, over 20% of Nvidia’s FY 2026 compute revenues remained driven by China — supported both by illegal GPU diversion and Southeast Asian intermediaries.
Nvidia has repeatedly vouched for Megaspeed — its single largest Southeast Asian chip buyer currently under investigation by both U.S. Commerce and Singapore authorities — as “wholly owned and operated by a company based and headquartered outside China, with no China shareholders.” Nvidia has also claimed that it has “repeatedly tested and sampled data centers around the world and found no diversion.” Documents we uncovered, however, suggest that Megaspeed has been secretly financed by Alibaba via a series of apparent shell companies. Tellingly, Nvidia’s lawyered phrasing — that Megaspeed holds no Chinese equity — doesn’t seem to preclude Chinese financing.
From Culper’s report on X (replete with another photo of Huang and Huang alongside each other at a festive occasion):
$NVDA CEO Huang has walked alongside Megaspeed at every step, and seems to have a close relationship with Megaspeed’s Alice Huang. They partied together in June 2024 — same month as the Apex/Alibaba pledge, then dined together in May 2025 — just after U.S. trade restrictions.
Per a current Megaspeed employee, “every single time” $NVDA’s CEO visits their facility, Alibaba reps come too. One former $NVDA employee told us that internally, Nvidia employees speculated as to the seemingly special nature of the relationship with Jensen.
The jig was clearly up back in May. Short-sellers were hinting at the affair, and the CIA obviously knew about it. That was the time for Jensen Huang to get on top of the story. At that point it was certain that the details were going to come out. The only question was if the details would come out on Huang’s terms or someone else’s.
Remember back in 2019 when the National Enquirer tried to blackmail Jeff Bezos, who at the time was having an affair with Lauren Sanchez (now his second wife), unbeknownst to MacKenzie Scott (now his ex-wife)? Huang should have done something more like what Bezos did: which was just come clean, publicly. Instead, Huang allowed Nvidia spokespeople and legal counsel to make fools of themselves lying on his behalf.
Fred Lambert, writing for Electrek:
Tesla painted a very different picture just two years ago. At its 2024 shareholder meeting, it showed this slide of its lineup: the Model 3, Model Y, Model S, Model X, Cybertruck, and Semi, plus three vehicles under covers that Musk said were “going to be pretty special.” Of the five consumer vehicles on that slide, three are now dead or on their way out. [...]
At Tesla’s Investor Day at Giga Texas on March 1, 2023, Musk mostly stayed out of the spotlight. Instead, Tesla paraded more than a dozen executives on stage to present its plans, a rare move for a company long criticized for being a one-man show. “We’ve obviously got significant bench strength here,” Musk said at the time.
Of the 14 executives named as presenters that day, seven are gone.
It’s kind of weird for a carmaker that’s currently the 11th-largest market cap company in the world to only have two vehicles in production.
Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Swan, Julian E. Barnes, and Tripp Mickle, reporting for The New York Times (gift link):
Mr. Rubio’s memo was circulated to administration officials with high-level security clearances ahead of a trip Mr. Trump took to China in May, the people briefed on the matter said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive material.
Despite his status as an A.I. pioneer and head of one of the world’s most valuable companies, Mr. Huang was initially left off the list of major business and tech executives invited to join Mr. Trump in China. It is unclear whether the exclusion was connected to the memo. By that point, a number of people inside the administration were concerned about Mr. Huang’s influence on the president’s policy of only lightly regulating A.I., people briefed on the matter said.
After Mr. Trump saw media coverage about Mr. Huang being absent from the delegation, the president asked him to join the trip by meeting Air Force One during a layover in Alaska. The president drafted a social media post saying that it was an honor to have “the Great Jensen Huang,” and other business leaders “journeying to the Great Country of China where I will be asking President Xi, a Leader of extraordinary distinction, to ‘open up’ China so that these brilliant people can work their magic.”
This Huang-Huang affair explains a few things that until now didn’t make sense, and Jensen Huang not being invited on that May trip to China — until Trump invited him on the fly at the Alaska layover — is one of them. Also worth noting that on multi-byline stories, The Times puts them in order of who contributed the most to the story. In this case it’s Haberman, who is closest to Trump and the White House:
Asked about Mr. Huang’s admission to his company about his affair with Ms. Huang, Mr. Trump told reporters on Sunday evening that he did not regret his own lack of action.
“No, I don’t think so,” the president said. He added that he believed Mr. Huang should stay on as Nvidia’s chief executive.
“I think he’s an honorable guy. I think he probably has an excuse for it. You have to hear it,” Mr. Trump said.
Trump, you will recall, was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to his hush-money payments to porno star Stormy Daniels, who banged him and (spanked him with a magazine with himself on the cover) at a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe in 2006. That was four months after Melania Trump, his third wife, gave birth to their son Barron. So take “he probably has an excuse for it” with a $130,000 grain of salt.
There’s a Journalism 101 adage that news stories should be written in an “upside down triangle”, with the most important information at the top and the least important at the bottom. Another little inside-baseball tidbit about The Times, however, is that The Times, rather uniquely, often buries the most interesting (but not most important) paragraph at the very end. This story ends thus:
In recent years, Megaspeed, despite having essentially a storefront office and little local footprint, purchased $2 billion worth of Nvidia’s products. Megaspeed builds data centers in Southeast Asia that rent out their computing power to Alibaba, the giant Chinese internet company. U.S. officials suspect Megaspeed has been helping smuggle restricted advanced Nvidia chips into China.
If true, this is politically damaging to both Nvidia and Huang personally, but the context is that Nvidia booked over $300 billion in revenue over the last year.
Julian E. Barnes, Tripp Mickle, Paul Mozur, and Maggie Haberman, reporting for The New York Times on Friday:
John Rizzo, an Nvidia spokesman, said that the company does not share classified information with its customers, and that customers do not ask Nvidia to press the U.S. government to change its policies on chip sales to China.
He added that the Chinese government had “consistently promoted its own domestic alternatives in China, including Huawei, and strictly limited imports of our data center products.”
Mr. Rizzo has maintained that Mr. Huang’s interactions with Ms. Huang were “not unusual” and consistent with the kinds of meetings he has with any of Nvidia’s many customers.
Turns out this was not true, unless Jensen Huang is consistently banging many of Nvidia’s customers. And it now looks especially bad that an Nvidia spokesman was effectively vouching for the Chinese government’s integrity when it comes to their interest in circumventing the ban against selling them high-end Nvidia hardware.
Liu Chang, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy, said The Times reporting was “unsubstantiated” and “nothing but smears against China.”
Turns out this was completely substantiated and everything it implies about the Chinese government is true.
Ms. Huang has not responded to multiple attempts to reach her for comment in recent days.
The Times has a photo of Ms. Huang with Mr. Huang at a Taipei party in 2024. She’s straight out of Central Casting for a Chinese honeypot.
The New York Times, back on October 29:
Nvidia said the company that employed Ms. Huang, Megaspeed, was like any other regional customer and that it had previously investigated and debunked claims the Singaporean company was smuggling chips to China. John Rizzo, a spokesman for Nvidia, said: “Jensen’s interactions with Ms. Huang are not unusual or unexpected. Meetings with customers are part of a C.E.O.’s job; Jensen talks with thousands of customer executives every year.”
Jensen Huang’s personal life is his personal life. But he’s made it Nvidia business — an Nvidia spokesman has been repeatedly on the record saying the Huang/Huang relationship was “not unusual”. If you want to cheat on your spouse that’s your business, but it’s irresponsible to allow employees at your company to tell what you know to be lies on your behalf.
Worse would be if it turns out that Megaspeed, the company Alice Huang works (worked?) at, was funneling Nvidia hardware to China in contravention of US national security law. That could make Jensen Huang’s position at Nvidia untenable.
Tripp Mickle, reporting for The New York Times:
Nvidia said on Sunday that it was opening an investigation into Jensen Huang, its chief executive and co-founder, after he acknowledged to the company’s board that he had been intimate with a business executive who U.S. intelligence determined to be a Chinese spy.
Mr. Huang’s relationship with the woman, who is named Alice Huang, became a U.S. government concern after surveillance revealed that she was feeding information directly to Beijing. The revelation raised troubling possibilities because Mr. Huang is one of the most powerful figures in the A.I. revolution as well as an influential ally of President Trump.
In a message to the company, Mr. Huang apologized. “I was unfaithful to my wife,” he said. “My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry.”
Nvidia’s board said that it had “no reason to believe that either national security or Nvidia secrets were compromised,” but that “the board’s inquiry will examine all available information.” It said Mr. Huang “fully supports the review and has committed to cooperating with it.”
When the NYT first broke this story a little over a week ago, they simply described Jensen Huang’s relationship with the Chinese spy, an executive at a Singapore data center company named Alice Huang (no relation), as “a close relationship”. Reading between the lines, though — including the fact that Donald Trump, once briefed on the situation, decided to keep it quiet — it seemed pretty clear what the story was.
Tyler Stalman and David Altizer were kind enough to have me on their show this week. These new MacBook Pros are very fun computers that are very fun to talk about.
(We even sneak in some love for Ricoh’s legendary GR line of compact cameras. I used my original GR-D from 20 years ago to shoot this 2010 photo of Steve Jobs and Walt Mossberg that I linked to in my feature-length “Touch and Glow” piece yesterday.)
I’m not cut out for Los Angeles.
It’s hard not to love the place, though. The weather is absurd. The people in LA, by and large, don’t believe in bad weather. It’s like a legend to them, like hearing about the Irish Potato Famine.
Angelenos are friendly and good looking. The food is good and varied. But you really do need to drive everywhere. Trips from any one part of the city to another invariably require time not just in a car but on a freeway. What is oft-described as LA’s sprawl, I would describe as a layout and geographic scale that is more like that of a small, densely populated nation than of a mere city. LA’s palpable vastness is incredible, in a wholly different sense than, say, Manhattan’s. I love to visit. I would never want to stay.
The greater San Francisco Bay Area, I don’t feel that way about. The weather there, too, is certainly nicer than back east, but it’s not implausibly nice. San Francisco is a walkable city and can punish you with its weather at certain times of the year. I’m not at all religious but I was raised in a Catholic family, and one way that’s stuck with me is that I innately believe we deserve some stretches of bad weather. That it’s good for us to suffer to some extent, like physical exercise and toiling at our jobs. That’s a stupid thing to believe, I know, but I believe it. We all believe some stupid things.
Los Angeles is an unusual place for Apple to hold a media event. They hold two big annual events on campus at Apple Park in Cupertino each year: WWDC in June, and the iPhone (and friends) event in September. Back in the old days, they held their major keynotes in San Francisco. I liked the old events in San Francisco better, if only because I enjoyed staying a few days in vibrant, gritty San Francisco better than the somnolent, sterile South Bay. But I think the events were more interesting too. Not better per se, but just more interesting. Less polished. More unique. Every inch of the Steve Jobs Theater was designed and crafted to host events like the annual iPhone introductions. It is an architectural marvel. But its perfection is off-putting. It somehow doesn’t quite feel realistic, even when you’re right there.
In its San Francisco events of yore, Apple experimented. The Macworld Expo and WWDC keynotes in Moscone North had an unavoidable sameness to them. But Apple held other events in other places in the 2010s, like the small Yerba Buena Theater across the street from Moscone, and the cavernous Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, which was built in 1915 and looks, feels, and smells like it. The room Apple used for its post-keynote hands-on area at Yerba Buena was always a little claustrophobic and very dark. This photo I took after the introduction of the original iPad in 2010 captures the feel of that room during those events.
A few years later, they held an event there in October 2013 and solved — or at least improved — the problem by knocking a hole in the wall to allow in some sunlight and fresh air. Here’s a picture from the hands-on area at that event, showing Tim Cook (Katie Cotton at his side, as ever) chatting with Ed Baig (then at USA Today, still on the beat today at AARP). You can see the open air over Cook’s shoulder.
After that event wound down, I grabbed lunch nearby, and then walked back through the plaza next to the theater. I don’t remember why. Best guess is that it was simply on the path back to my hotel. Apple already had a crew taking apart the entrance they’d added to the theater. Katie Cotton was outside, supervising. I stopped to chat. This was around 2:20pm, a little over four hours after the keynote and probably only 90 minutes after they’d politely escorted the last of us from the hands-on area inside. I didn’t write notes or record the chat, which would have been weird, but as best I recall, the conversation started with my saying something like “Man, you guys don’t waste any time, do you?” Cotton told me that while Apple loved the Yerba Buena venue, they were always bothered by the hands-on area being closed off and dark. I said that yes, it was previously a dank hellhole, and she laughed. She always seemed to genuinely enjoy my sarcasm. Apple, she explained, had inquired about options for opening that wall. Yerba Buena told them, sure, they could do whatever they wanted so long as they restored it after the event, but it would cost a small fortune. But to Apple the price was negligible, and they accepted the offer immediately and commenced planning how to do it.1 Cotton liked how it turned out, and I told her I agreed. It made for a noticeably nicer space.
My column about that October 2013 event began thus:
There is a certain sameness to almost every Apple event. A pattern, a formula, a structure, a rhythm and pacing. Does this make them boring? In some ways, certainly, insofar as the only thing we don’t know is what they’re going to say, as opposed to how they’re going to say it. (And even then, we often have a pretty good idea what they’re going to announce, too.)
And I went on to quote from — and then disagree with — then-NYT tech columnist Nick Bilton’s griping that Apple’s keynotes lacked “wow” and had grown stale. (Bilton is now leading failson David Ellison’s team of dipshit weasels who are sinking 60 Minutes, the crown jewel of CBS News.)
Somehow, here we are 13 years later (alas, not all of us), and there are still complaints about the repetitive sameness of Apple’s events. Yet Apple’s events these days don’t resemble that event from 2013 at all. Change comes slowly but it always comes.
I enjoyed last week’s “Pro and Tell” event more than any in recent memory. I enjoyed the venue — both the unique building and the city. I enjoyed the format. But most of all I loved the subject: the Mac.
The building is best known as CBS Columbia Square, opened in 1937 as the West Coast headquarters for CBS. The color of the event was blue — matching the default wallpaper for the new MacBook Pros with PROLED XDR displays. Blue carpet covered the sidewalk leading into the entrance. After walking up the carpet, checking in outside, and donning my press lanyard, the magnetometer dinged me, and I was pulled aside and politely but brusquely asked to put my briefcase on the (carpeted) ground, and wait for a busy police dog to take a smell at it. I presume the dog was sniffing for weapons, not drugs, but either way my bag passed muster. Inside, just past the lobby, Apple had created a rather spacious theater, with a large screen and stage. There were blue padded bench seats along the outside walls, but the primary center area of the space was for standing. From the floor to the room’s high ceiling, the walls were blue.
Behind the theater was a large area with coffee, water, and small breakfast treats. Invited guests — primarily tech journalists and social media creators — mingled and sipped. I checked my laptop bag, and carried only my notebook and phone for the morning. Apple PR reps were, as ever, present but never overpresent. Conversation touched upon the expected but as yet unknown touch-enabled MacBook Pros. Word spread that Steven Levy, the undisputed dean of the Apple press corps, had landed an exclusive first look for Wired. (Levy, ever the pro, and a delightful raconteur, confirmed only that, yes, he had the exclusive, but he offered not a word regarding its content before his agreed-upon embargo. His wry smile, though, betrayed that he was happy with what Apple was about to unveil.) Much of the pre-event chatter, however, was dominated by discussion about the iPhone Duo. A rather remarkable number of attendees had Duos in hand — many of them still in the midst of reviewing it, but others professed to having already gone all-in on it. To each their own; there’s no accounting for taste.
Shortly before 10am, word spread that it was time to pack into the theater. I squeezed in close to the stage. Why not? Steve Jobs, I noted, never took the stage quite on time. He was seldom more than two or three minutes late, but he was always at least two or three minutes late. Rock stars don’t take the stage on time. Tim Cook, on the other hand, was never late. A minute early, sometimes; a minute late, never. You could set your watch to 10:00 by listening for his “Good morning!”
John Ternus took the stage at 10:00.
He spoke briefly. Just a few minutes recapping Apple’s week of announcements. The new OLED iPad Mini, the new M6 MacBook Pro, the updates to Creator Studio. He spoke naturally and comfortably, and seemingly extemporaneously. He looks like he smells like Apple Park. He’s a cool guy. And he knows that Tim Cook handed him a killer lineup of new products to introduce over his first two months as CEO. Every one of Apple’s major platforms is in a good-to-great place. His on-stage remarks culminated with the introduction of the truly new MacBook Pros: “That’s why we’re here today — to mark another huge moment for MacBook Pro, and for the Mac itself.” When Ternus then announced, a moment later, “And yes, for the very first time, we are bringing touch to the Mac”, the audience erupted in gasps and cheers — a reminder that for as much as many of us know before Apple makes these announcements, a lot of the people in attendance do not even know who Mark Gurman is. A lot of the people in the room were genuinely shocked and surprised.
Apple paid a lot of money to put a fantastically bright screen behind Ternus, and they used that screen to show this two-minute “If you give a Mac an OLED” intro video. The first mention of touchscreen support, in that video, comes a full third of the way in.
Ternus teased the return of the glowing back-of-the-display Apple logo in a tweet that morning. On stage he made it official: “The logo is back.” I love the way he phrased that. Not “the glowing logo is back”. Just “the logo is back” — like it might as well not have been there in the unilluminated years since 2016. Fuck yeah.
The show in the theater was short and sweet. We shuttled off to the hands-on area by 10:15, if not sooner. The format of the event — or “experience”, as Apple calls these — mirrored that of the MacBook Neo experience in New York back in March. Brief welcoming remarks from Ternus, a crisp short video presented to a standing room of invited media guests, and then, boom, a scramble off to an expansive hands-on area. Apple didn’t stream Ternus’s live-on-stage remarks to the world back in March, and they chose not to again last week. They should. These aren’t live keynote events, but they are live events. I’m glad I’ve gotten to see them in person, but I wish everyone could see them online. They are good. Good things should be shown. Apple is run by people. Seeing the company’s CEO live on stage is a rare glimpse behind the aluminum and glass facade.
One is an anomaly. Two is a pattern. The Neo event (err, experience) back in March was like no other. This “Pro and Tell” MacBook Pro event was a lot like the Neo one. The Neo one didn’t get a punny title though — just a simple “You’re Invited” on the email invitation (although the decoration of the Apple logo hinted at the Neo’s signature citrus colorway). The Columbia Square building in Los Angeles is large, but it’s nowhere near as spacious as the empty warehouse in Chelsea where Apple held the Neo event. There seemingly were more invitees at last week’s event in LA too. In New York back in March, there was room to mingle. I snapped this fun photo of Jason Snell chatting with Phil Schiller, Greg Joswiak, and then-still-SVP-of-hardware John Ternus. Even setting aside Ternus’s subsequent promotion to CEO and levelling up in celebrity, that chat couldn’t have happened in the hands-on area of this event. There were too many people and too little space.
In the scramble after leaving the theater area, Apple reps were gladly informing attendees that there were two separate hands-on areas, and that “the one in the back” might be less crowded. It wasn’t. Both areas were tightly packed. They were tight tube-like hallways, with black walls, good lighting, and Apple Store-like tables upon which were arrayed the new MacBook Pros. Silver and space black; 14- and 16-inch; nano-texture and glossy. Some of the tables featured Apple’s speed-bumped M6 MacBook Pros, the enclosures for which are nearly indistinguishable from the machines everyone really wanted to see — the PROLED XDR M5 Pro and M5 Max models. I saw several attendees poking and sliding their fingers on the screens of those M6 models, to no avail, until someone gently told them “These are just the other new MacBook Pros.”
Packed shoulder-to-shoulder in a confined space with low ceilings, jostling for hands-on time with the PROLED XDR models, the temperatures — both atmospheric and emotional — got uncomfortably warm. It also became clear that some of the attendees chose not to shower that morning. The scene brought to mind the pungent imagery of the “coach” cars in Bong Joon-ho’s Snowpiercer.
The Steve Jobs Theater, this was not.
But that’s not a complaint. This was different and different is good. It was a unique event in a unique venue. That’s good for Apple and good for those of us with the fortune to be invited to attend these things. Events at Steve Jobs Theater are held the SJT way. Apple adjusts and tweaks them, but the space defines them. An altogether new venue, whose ground floor Apple seemingly built out from scratch for this event, requires thinking about everything. And Apple’s thoughts are revealing. What I took away from the hands-on at this event is that Apple wanted us to get close to these MacBooks. To really look at them and appreciate them. No, they’re not radically different. They’re subtly different. But subtly different in very significant ways. That’s not exciting but it’s correct. The old MacBook Pros (including the new M6 model) were, by far, the best professional laptops ever made. The new ones are just better.
I like the hands-on scrums. There’s an energy to them you can use to gauge interest. When the products are genuinely exciting there’s a buzz that can’t be faked. People were fucking excited by these new MacBook Pros, and rightly so. These are the machines many of the people in attendance use themselves for their own work — our own work — all day, every day. The new tandem OLED displays are quite literally brilliant. You can see the difference even when they’re not side-by-side with the old mini-LEDs. When they are side-by-side, the old displays look washed. The new ones look wow.
And the “hands-on” aspect came into literal play two ways. First, yes, you can tap, swipe, and pinch the displays. Some people cared about that. A lot of others in the room, including yours truly, not so much. But even those of us who were ambivalent, at best, about touch coming to the Mac had reason to rejoice upon seeing Apple’s implementation: Apple added touchscreen support to MacOS the right way. Touch is decidedly secondary on MacOS. The density of the UI doesn’t change at all when you’re using a mouse pointer, and it only changes slightly to create larger tap targets when you touch the screen. This is the way. I would have bet that Apple would do it this way, but every bet is uncertain. And though the likelihood was low the stakes were high — a completely touch-first reimagining of the MacOS user interface would have been a devastating blow to an irreplaceable platform.
Second, the weight reduction Apple was able to achieve with these machines is astonishing. The 14-inch models weigh a full half pound less. The 16-inch models weigh 0.7 pounds less. Almost three-quarters of a pound! I saw numerous attendees picking up the hands-on demo machines to compare them to the personal MacBook Pros they were lugging around the event in their backpacks. Eureka after eureka. These are massive reductions in weight without — claims Apple — any decrease in sustained performance or battery life.
Next up, for some of us, were product briefings. I saw a disassembled PROLED XDR display panel. Five layers (I think?), each of them impossibly thin. A friend who was in another briefing group said the front panel cover glass shattered in the hands of one writer when it was passed around for examination. In my group — which might have been after that one — we didn’t get to touch anything.
Putting OLED into a laptop doesn’t magically make it good. Apple had a side-by-side comparison with a Lenovo Yoga 9 Whatever with an OLED display. The colors on that display were slightly greenish when viewed head-on, and garishly green when viewed off-angle. The colors on Apple’s PROLED XDR look remarkably good from any angle. Most surprising to me was Windows 11’s bizarrely clunky support for HDR images. When you open an HDR image, it displays as SDR, then you wait like 5–10 seconds for the display to “warm up” and only then does it show it in HDR — and when it does, the colors look bad. Getting a brief taste of “modern” Windows feels like visiting Cuba or something.
In the not-for-attribution Q&A after the briefing, I asked about the fact that the original glowing Apple logo in MacBooks — and PowerBooks — was a byproduct of the fact that the displays were backlit. There was a bright light sealed up inside the back of those display panels, and someone at Apple had the idea that if they just cut out the Apple logo on the back and fit it with translucent plastic, it would glow. Steve Jobs loved the idea and the rest is history. Every Mac laptop from 1999 through 2016 had a logo that glowed. Photos like this one from 2007 are iconic.
But OLED doesn’t use a backlight. Each pixel lights up on its own, which is how OLED’s blacks are so utterly black, and how light bleed is so drastically reduced. So if there’s no backlight, does that mean the new glowing logo has a light source of its own? Yes, was the answer. Apple engineered a custom light source just to enable the logo to glow once again, without adding any additional thickness to the lid. Someone else in my briefing group asked why Apple would bother doing that. “Because it’s awesome,” was the answer, which I’m quoting exactly and fully. That was the entire answer. Because it’s awesome.
If you work in a dark environment where the glowing logo might prove a distraction, or if you’ve had your sense of fun surgically removed, you can disable the light. The light-up logo was a particular source of joy for Apple executives and product managers, including the fact that they managed to keep it entirely secret. One difference between this new glowing logo and the old ones from 1999–2016 is that when the light is turned off on this one, it just looks like the highly polished Apple logos from MacBooks since 2016. It doesn’t look, at all, like a light that is turned off. Thus, Apple was able to keep it from leaking by not enabling the illumination in the builds of MacOS that were used by employees who were testing preproduction models inside the company.
Pure awesomeness. Fun for the sake of fun on the back. The best laptop display in the industry — by a long shot — on the front. How utterly Mac-like.
In the late afternoon came the “Pro Workflow Showcase”, on the third and fourth floors of the building. (The second floor held a cafe and an outdoor terrace with a separate coffee bar. There was an entire other cafe downstairs on the first floor. The coffee, as usual, was pretty good, and the small plates tasty and fresh.) This showcase featured half a dozen demonstrations from creative professionals using the Mac in innovative ways to pursue their various crafts. Impressive demos from obviously talented artists, one and all.
U.K. filmmaking brothers Will and Ed Reid (a.k.a. “The Reids”) showed off their “4D Gaussian splatting” workflow, which allows them to capture immersive 3D scenes using a synchronized array of nine iPhones used as cameras. Portrait photographer Jeremy Cowart, from Nashville, demonstrated his crazily customized studio workflow, which allows him to capture and process hundreds of still photos per minute, with the background behind the subject shifting with each frame. Record producer Fab Dupont, who has worked with musicians ranging from Bad Bunny to David Crosby, mixed music live in Logic Pro. (Dupont was particularly fond of the touchscreen on the new MacBook Pros, which he repeatedly stated he expected to ignore.) From the fashion world, the wife and husband duo of designers Susan Fang and Orelio de Jonghe showed off an array of intricate 3D-printed clothing, gowns, and accessories. I found a new pair of eyeglass frames that, I’m told, suit my face. (Photo credit: Austin Mann.) And then, most delightfully and surprisingly, there was a two-section demo area from Japanese experimental botanist and “haute couture” florist Azuma Makoto. Azuma was the subject of Flower Punk, a documentary short by Alison Klayman for The New Yorker back in 2020 — which, now that I’ve seen his work up close in person, is high atop my to-watch list. Azuma uses the Mac in multiple ways. First, to design elaborate, beautiful botanical sculptures. Second, to design and engineer intricate contraptions and machines — research equipment — that allow him and his team to optimize and control the blooming of picked flowers. Third, to control that equipment in operation. The machines are as beautiful as the flowers. I commented on the mechanical switches. They beg to be flipped just to feel them click. After hearing my brief question translated into Japanese, Azuma’s partner Shiinoki Shunsuke answered at length, with great enthusiasm. They’re often asked, he said, why they design their custom equipment with analog controls, rather than control them entirely through software. They feel that the physical nature of the plants inside the machines demands physical controls to manipulate their environment. It’s like touching the flowers without touching them. A beautiful description of hauntingly beautiful works at the intersection of technology, biology, and art. It’s like Doc Brown from Back to the Future meets Martha Stewart.
Oh, and there was one other demo station. It was from a small filmmaking outfit named Industrial Light and Magic, and the primary demo was helmed by John Knoll. Knoll co-created an image editor for the Mac in 1987 with his brother Thomas, and has pushed the cutting edge of VFX across five decades at ILM. Both the image editor and the movies he’s worked on have achieved a fair degree of renown and success. When I saw him, I was nearly dumbfounded. It was all I could do not to walk up to him and say what my mind was screaming: “You’re John Fucking Knoll.” John Fucking Knoll, doing demos on the fourth floor. Holy shit.
Knoll brought with him an elaborate rig from ILM. A spaceship model from Star Wars: Skeleton Crew. A real physical model. Behind the ship was a very large LED screen — a smaller version of the cavernous “Volume” 75-foot chamber that ILM first used for The Mandalorian in 2019. A miniature Volume for miniature models. In front of the ship was an iPhone camera with a large lens mounted on a track. In front of the track stood Knoll, controlling the whole apparatus from a MacBook Pro (with logo aglow, natch). Knoll built this motion-tracking camera control system in his garage and wrote the firmware himself. Of course. He’s John Fucking Knoll. And he showed us how they use this system to shoot a practical spaceship model flying through hyperspace that is being rendered, live, on the LED behind the model. It’s all just captured in camera. The secret is genlock, which syncs the video rendered on the LED in front of the camera with the video being captured on the camera — synchronized precisely not merely to the millisecond but to the microsecond.
There are two questions I can remember being obsessed with as a child, that started me on the path to what ultimately became my career. The first was, “How did they make Star Wars?”2 Now here I was, seeing, just a little at least, exactly how they make Star Wars today — in arm’s reach of an actual goddamn ILM spaceship miniature. And a big part of the answer of how they make it today is, “With the Mac.”
By my count Apple held four major events this year. Two of them were the inviolable tentpoles of the annual Apple calendar: WWDC in June, and the iPhone event in September — both held, as usual, at Apple Park. WWDC is the all-encompassing software event for all of Apple’s platforms. The iPhone event is the iPhone event, with Apple Watch as the opening act.
Apple’s other two major events in 2026 were the no-event-title Neo introduction in New York in March, and last week’s “Pro and Tell” introduction for the new MacBook Pros in Los Angeles — both of them big, expensive productions, both held in big, expensive cities far from Cupertino.
Now consider Jason Snell’s Six Colors chart of Apple’s quarterly revenue by product line for the last five years, up through last week’s results for Q4 2026:
The green sliver represents the Mac’s share. Snell’s original chart is interactive — you can hover over it and get the specific breakdown for each quarter. The Mac’s share is consistently in the range of 7 to 9 percent for Q2, Q3, and Q4 each year. The iPhone is consistently around 50 percent in those quarters. In Q1 — the October/November/December holiday quarter — the iPhone jumps to around 60 percent, and the Mac drops to 5 or 6 percent. Year after year.
The Mac accounts for high single digits of Apple’s revenue. High single digits, yes, but single digits. Yet two out of Apple’s four major events this year were focused entirely on the Mac. If you’re a pissant grump, you could argue that both of those events were wasteful, self-indulgent preening on Apple’s part. That the first one, for the MacBook Neo, was simply to announce a MacBook that cost $500 less than the previous entry point model, the MacBook Air. And the second one, last week in Los Angeles, was simply to announce MacBook Pros that cost $400 more than the previous ones, just to add touchscreen support that PC laptops have offered at lower prices for over a decade. All of this for a platform that doesn’t even account for 10 percent of the company’s revenue, with an operating system that ought to be put out to pasture.
What a miserably wrongheaded, ignorant, joyless take that would be.
These new MacBook Pros are worth showing off. What Mac users do and create on the platform is worth celebrating.
When I began closely following Apple, the Macintosh was Apple and Apple was the Macintosh. That hasn’t been true since the iPhone began its meteoric rise. Financially, Apple today is the iPhone, Services, and “everything else”.
But at the true center of Steve Jobs’s metaphorical intersection of Technology and the Liberal Arts, the Mac remains the heart and soul of everything Apple does, and responsible for so much of what users create with Apple’s products. We speak of people — both inside and outside the company — bleeding six colors. But the iPhone never had a six-color logo.
Apple has continuously adapted the Mac for changing times, changing technology, and a changing world, yet — for four decades — has kept it true to its original core. The Mac today is very recognizably the Mac to any user from any time in its illustrious history. Even touchscreen support, now, has been added the Macintosh way.
In 2010 I wrote “The Future of the Mac in an iOS World”. That piece has held up pretty well:
Here’s the short version of the “Mac is doomed” scenario: iOS is the future, Mac OS X is the past, and Apple, unlike most major tech companies, is strongly inclined to abandon the past in the name of the future.
You can’t really argue with that, can you? But the premise that the end is near for the Mac presupposes quite a bit about the near-term future of iOS. [...]
It’s the heaviness of the Mac that allows iOS to remain light.
When I say that iOS has no baggage, that’s not because there is no baggage. It’s because the Mac is there to carry it. Long term — say, ten years out — well, all good things must come to an end. But in the short term, Mac OS X has an essential role in an iOS world: serving as the platform for complex, resource-intensive tasks. The funny thing is, the best slogan to describe the Mac’s role is the same one it started with 25 years ago:
The computer for the rest of us.
I was only wrong then in fretting that the Mac might — perhaps — only have a decade or so yet ahead of it. Here we are now 16 years later and the Macintosh is more popular, more essential, more successful, and further ahead of its ostensible competition than ever in its 42-year history. Change comes slowly but it always comes.
The logo not only glows again. It might glow forever. ★
I am reminded of the delightful story of how Microsoft wound up with the rights to “Start Me Up” for the Windows 95 launch. The Rolling Stones had theretofore never licensed a song for use in a commercial. Mick Jagger had always handled such inquiries not by saying “no”, but instead by quoting astronomically high prices. Microsoft asked about “Start Me Up”, Jagger gave them a no-way-they’ll-say-yes price (supposedly $12 million) and Microsoft simply said, “Great, that’s a deal.” ↩︎
Apple Support:
To make the Apple logo dark in all lighting conditions, you can turn off its illumination using Terminal, which is in the Utilities folder of your Applications folder. You can also use Spotlight to find and open it.
Type or paste this command in Terminal, then press Return:
sudo defaults write com.apple.CoreBrightness LEBacklightMode -int 0[...]
To turn logo illumination on again, enter this command in Terminal:
sudo defaults delete com.apple.CoreBrightness LEBacklightMode
Apple might make this a GUI setting, but if I were them, I’d keep it this way. Make the people without fun in their souls use the Terminal command.
(Keeping it as a defaults setting also helps emphasize that you save no meaningful battery life by turning it off. If this gets exposed as a GUI preference, I could see it spreading as a dumb-ass “pro tip” to turn it off to save battery life, like the unshakeable utterly wrongheaded belief millions hold that they should religiously force-quit apps on iOS, when in fact doing so chews up more energy when the apps get relaunched from a cold start.)
The WSJ, “Trump Signs Proclamation He Says Will Protect Oval Office From Major Changes”:
President Trump signed a proclamation Thursday that he said would designate the White House’s Oval Office and Cabinet Room as landmarks to prevent future presidents from making major changes to them.
“They won’t be able to be taken down, destroyed, touched or anything else,” Trump told reporters. “It’s called, actually, a national monument. It’s a federal landmark, and when completed and when we get the documentation fully done, legally binding, it’ll make it impossible for anybody ever to destroy this incredible space.”
Oh, buddy, every last bit of that pyrite cack will be pried off the walls and in a dumpster by mid-morning on 20 January 2029.
You know that scene in Pulp Fiction where John Travolta’s Vincent Vega tells his drug dealer (Eric Stoltz) about his vintage Chevy Malibu getting keyed? “Boy I wish I could’ve caught him doing it. I’d have given anything to catch that asshole doing it. It would have been worth him doing it, just so I could’ve caught him. What’s more chickenshit than fucking with a man’s automobile?”
I sort of feel that way about Trump and the next two years.
Salon, in an unsigned goodbye post:
Thirty-one years is a remarkable run, but what matters most is what happened during those years: the journalism, the ideas, the voices, the conversations and the community that grew around them. Salon helped demonstrate what digital journalism could be and could become. We hope that legacy will continue to matter long after today.
I hope the archives stay online, but considering the care taken for this announcement, I doubt it.
Salon felt old and established when I started Daring Fireball in 2002. They were pioneers of treating the web as a first-class medium. A quick search indicates that I’ve linked to Salon in 27 posts here, starting with this one in 2003 (which was primarily a retort to a Paul Boutin column for Slate), and most recently with this April 2025 post that linked to a 2013 Salon article.
Apple’s dynamic configuration UI in their online store doesn’t hide or disguise the pricing or configuration options, but it doesn’t present all of the options at a glance. I find it useful to organize all of the configuration options into tables on a single page, and I figured it might be useful to share this now, before I finish writing my full thoughts on the redesigned hardware and displays for the PROLED XDR models.
Notes:
The old-style (mini-LED, no touchscreens, heavier) M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros were announced and began shipping in March 2026, alongside the new Studio Display and Studio Display XDR, the MacBook Neo, and M5 MacBook Airs.
The new but old-style plain 14-inch M6 MacBook Pro was announced in October 2026 and is set to begin shipping in early November.
The all-new PROLED XDR (touchscreens, lighter weight) M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros were announced in October 2026 and are set to begin shipping in early November.
As in previous generations, there are no 16-inch models for the plain M6 or the chip-binned fewer-core M5 Pro configurations. The 16-inch MacBook Pro starts with the full 18-core CPU / 20-core GPU M5 Pro chip.
16-inch models, when available, cost $300 more than the same-specced 14-inch configuration.
Nano-texture displays are an option for all MacBook Pro models, and always cost $150.
The new PROLED XDR models cost $400 more than the equivalent old-style ones. This $400 difference is true for both 14- and 16-inch models.
The new 16 TB SSD upgrade is exclusively available for M5 Max models with the new PROLED XDR displays. It costs a smooth $7,000 more than the base 2 TB storage.
12-core CPU / 12-core GPU:
14-inch: $2000
16-inch: N/A
PROLED XDR: N/A
Nano-texture: +150
RAM: 16 GB +0
24 GB +200
32 GB +400
SSD: 1 TB +0
2 TB +500
4 TB +1500
15-core CPU / 16-core GPU:
14-inch: $2500
16-inch: N/A
PROLED XDR: +400
Nano-texture: +150
RAM: 24 GB +0
48 GB +600
SSD: 1 TB +0
2 TB +500
4 TB +1500
18-core CPU / 20-core GPU:
14-inch: $2700
16-inch: $3000
PROLED XDR: +400
Nano-texture: +150
RAM: 24 GB +0
48 GB +600
64 GB +1000
SSD: 1 TB +0
2 TB +500
4 TB +1500
18-core CPU / 32-core GPU:
14-inch: $4100
16-inch: $4400
PROLED XDR: +400
Nano-texture: +150
RAM: 36 GB +0
SSD: 2 TB +0
4 TB +1000
8 TB +3000
16 TB +7000 (PROLED XDR only)
18-core CPU / 40-core GPU:
14-inch: $4700
16-inch: $5000
RAM: 48 GB +0
64 GB +400
128 GB +2000
SSD: 2 TB +0
4 TB +1000
8 TB +3000
16 TB +7000 (PROLED XDR only)
To me, the most curious detail in these tables is that if you select the chip-binned M5 Max with only 32 GPU cores, the one and only RAM configuration is 36 GB. The “full” M5 Max with 40 GPU cores starts with 48 GB of RAM in the base configuration.
For size, weight, battery life, and display brightness differences, consult Apple’s ever-excellent Compare tool, preconfigured with that link to show the 14-inch models with M6, M5 Max (mini-LED), and M5 Max with PROLED XDR. (PDF archive of that Compare page, archived today for posterity.) ★
One of the many small pleasures of my job is when someone else writes a good take on a subject that I have been meaning to write myself. Occasionally this stings, because it was something I really wanted to write myself. But usually it’s just awesome, because it’s an article I wanted to exist, didn’t really want to do the work of writing myself, and now it exists and I can just link to it, perhaps with commentary. It’s like finding money on the ground or in the pocket of a jacket you haven’t worn in months.
That’s what happened yesterday with Glenn Fleishman’s “Why Notes Will Never Let Us Edit Markdown”, and my link to it. Found money!
But one of the reasons I’d been procrastinating on writing about Apple Notes and its growing support for Markdown import/export and copy/paste is that Notes is built around a text formatting idea that, to my knowledge, doesn’t really have a name. And without a name, it’s hard to write about. I’m going to suggest calling it prestructured WYSIWYG.
Apps like Apple’s Messages and especially Notes exemplify prestructured WYSIWYG, and I’m a huge fan of the idea. It’s low-key one of the best ideas and trends in software design of the last 15 years or so. Messages lets you apply WYSIWYG spans of character styles like bold and italics, but you can’t choose typefaces or define your own styles. Notes takes this further, adding inline hyperlinks and predefined block styles like title / heading / subheading, monostyled (e.g. for code), and ordered and unordered lists. But there is no Font menu or preference setting in Notes or Messages to change the default typeface. The “Aᴀ” formatting popover in Notes doesn’t have a control to change the typeface, only its preset styles, all of which are rendered in your notes using Apple’s San Francisco system font family.1 That would have seemed not just weird but downright wrong back in the early decades of the Mac (the era Fleishman calls the “Mac Is Not a Typewriter” era, referencing Robin Williams’s groundbreaking book). In those days, text was either plain text (a string of characters, no style at all, like a typewriter) or rich text, and if it was rich text, you expected to choose any font (and size) you wanted.
That era of anything-goes WYSIWYG presented unavoidable problems. On the technical side, the list of fonts installed on my computer isn’t the same as the list of fonts on your computer. Each operating system comes with its own set of included fonts. And the sort of people most interested in selecting their own typefaces are exactly the same people who are most likely to install third-party fonts. That’s a technical problem that can’t really be solved. There’s also an aesthetic problem. Most people, given the ability to choose their own fonts, make terrible typographic choices.
Prestructured WYSIWYG solves both problems. You get the expressiveness of abstract semantic styles like bold, italics, and monospace, and you get larger sizes for headings. But you avoid both the “missing font” technical problems and the “terrible font” design choices. If you use Apple Notes or Messages, you better like Apple’s San Francisco system font family, because that’s what you’re going to get. It’s great for accessibility, because all the type sizes are relative, not absolute. And these preset styles largely map well to Markdown, which itself has no concern with font choices or specific text sizes.
Even if you’re a decent designer (or believe yourself to be), it’s liberating not to have a say in the matter in certain contexts. Note-taking is exactly such a context. Email ought to be another, but alas, full-fledged WYSIWYG gained a foothold there long ago, and now it’s entrenched. Constraints are sometimes freeing. ★
There is a huge but here. Notes, on the Mac and only on the Mac, does allow you to pick arbitrary fonts. Format → Font → Show Fonts (⌘T) shows the standard AppKit Fonts palette, and you can use that to change the font in a note to anything you want. I think this is historical baggage from earlier versions of the Notes app for Mac. Or maybe there are some Mac Notes users inside Apple who really do use this. Font choices made in Notes on the Mac are rendered on iOS and iPadOS, if the selected font is available. It even works for third-party fonts (which are quite complicated to install on iOS). Here’s a screenshot of a note with custom fonts that I made on my Mac, and the same note as it appears on iOS, where only some of those fonts are installed. But you cannot change custom fonts in Notes on iOS.
I can’t say Apple discourages you from dicking around with fonts in Notes on the Mac. It’s right there in the standard AppKit Fonts panel. But most casual Mac users don’t know about the standard AppKit Fonts panel. When they pick fonts in apps like Mail, TextEdit, and Pages, they do it from toolbars in the window. So Apple doesn’t encourage you to dick around with fonts in Notes on the Mac either. If they wanted to encourage it, there’d be a toolbar with a Font menu on the Mac, and it would be possible to change fonts on iOS too.
So I say it’s best to pretend that Apple Notes doesn’t support custom font choices. Let it go — even if, like me, it drives you crazy that Notes and only Notes uses that childish-looking alternative single-story “a” glyph in San Francisco. ↩︎